Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts

Thursday, March 8, 2012

KONY2012 -- What you probably don't know but should

I watched the video yesterday afternoon. It broke that part of my heart that bleeds for a noble cause. I was sold.

Make Joseph Kony famous. Publicize his crimes. Make the world aware. Make governments care. Develop a viral campaign to bring together the voices of millions for the benefit of tens of thousands. Find this guy. Arrest him. Bring him to trial.

And then what?

In all likelihood, some lieutenant takes his place and carries the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) forward with similar or somewhat diminished results. Think Kim Jong Un.

The video impressed me first as something that should win accolades at Sundance. Touching. Endearing. Tragic. Hopeful. Inspiring. It so happens that later in the evening, I was discussing the video with some friends, sometimes professional skeptics. They raised questions and did research and truly tore back the curtain on the issues raised by Invisible Children’s documentary.

I remain sold on the cause, but not necessarily the method. Let me be clear on that. Murder, kidnapping, rape, torture, and mutilation of children and their families should never happen. Putting US soldiers in the field with no international consensus places a burden on taxpayers and a double burden on the soldiers and military families, whose taxes also pay for this.

What I learned from the likes of Mark D. VandenBerg and others, and the articles they cited, tint this most decidedly black-and-white issue in a deep, rich gray. An NPR piece airing this afternoon confirmed much of what I learned overnight. The following hints at the accusations of ulterior motives, a larger conspiracy theory, and why, despite all of that, I still believe in and will support Invisible Children.

Ulterior motive
These Invisible Children folks are opportunists using half of the money donated to their charity to finance their film making efforts. They bring attention to Uganda when Kony’s forces have long since left.

Conspiracy
  • Theory: The US sent troops to Uganda to secure the area in the wake of newly discovered oil and China’s interest in that oil. Invisible Children receives grant money from the government to raise popular awareness of the issue, unwittingly justifying an increased US involvement.
  • Fact: The US Government has sent troops into Uganda in the past to assist in the capture of Kony.
  • Opinion: Therefore, the dispatching of advisers by President Barack Obama to Uganda in November is not without precedent.
  • Fact: Joseph Kony hasn’t been active in Uganda since 2005 (presumably because of previous US efforts to capture him).
  • Fact: Oil was recently discovered in Uganda.
  • Fact: Uganda and Tanzania recently signed a deal with China selling oil rights.
  • Fact: Members of the Ugandan Army also commit atrocities against their citizens. No one is innocent here, folks.
  • Fact:  Kony is only part of the problem, and not a major player when stacked up against other warlords and regional, state-sponsored genocide.
  • Fact: Whether or not by design, Invisible Children advocates for the deployment of US forces to a hostile region (opinion) to participate in an undeclared war.
Links:

Conclusion
Invisible Children is calling for US military involvement in a largely lawless region with virtually no access to secured supply lines. That’s my assessment. I wish they would instead raise money to pay for mercenaries from Academi (formerly Blackwater) to do the job.

What continues to inspire me about the whole KONY2012 campaign is the power of new media. Invisible Children may in fact be all about movie making. Honestly, as I watched the opening of the video about this time yesterday, I couldn't get the word Sundance out of my head. I'm sure these guys are at least partially seeking some glory and access to the highest of the "hip" circles.

I suppose, for me, it all comes back to this: Isn't doing something better than doing nothing? [Speaking from the perspective of Invisible Children and my inclination to support its efforts.]

The cited Foreign Affairs article aptly pointed to the "grain of sand in the desert" implications of this effort, but maybe, just maybe, it would inspire the UN and specific, affected governments to at least begin to think about a comprehensive plan to end the cycle(s) of violence.

I'm not naive. I remember reading about turmoil in Africa while in grade school in the '70s and wrote a research paper on South Africa's destabilization of southern Africa while a military history grad student in the '90s. If I'm around in 50 years, odds are the situation won't have changed much, barring the Second Coming, aliens, Black Plague or another Krakatoa. However, I maintain hope in the premise that this connection with the world we can all now experience as a result of new media and technology can serve to focus many voices and potentially influence policy in ways and at a time like no other.

Whether KONY2012 accomplishes its end goal, this experience brought to us by these filmmakers will not be forgotten. It will, I believe, serve to inspire “common people” to donate their time and efforts to illuminate other widely unknown or largely ignored issues happening right now around the world.

Support KONY2012 or not, but recognize its true impact. Learn from it and use what is reasonable as a model for future efforts to help those who have no voice.

Massive hat tip to Mark for all of his research.

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Independents Day

What follows is my response to an article posted by a friend on Facebook regarding the upcoming general election. I do a great job of microblogging on Facebook and less well posting here. This is a start. Enjoy ...

For the first time, I am considering not voting despite challenging the apathetic for years with, "If you don't vote, you can't complain for 1,420 odd days."

My issue is larger than President Obama. My issue is (and has been) with the party that *cares* about those in need, but doesn't, as a party, have the balls to draw a line and fight for its own beliefs. Its campaign managers, advisors strategists have been brilliant individuals, but collectively, they couldn't market themselves out of a Ziplock Bag. They fail, always, at communicating their successes in a way about which their base and independents can feel warm and fuzzy, let alone excited.

Did I vote for the president because I believe in racial equality and was wanting to send a message? In part, yes. Plus, he was the democratic nominee (normally a no brainer). Plus his eloquence and passion were light years beyond that of his predecessor.

I believed. I still do a little bit. But I believed in him, not the machine. I was a party faithful, increasingly disgruntled as I became over time. I no longer consider myself an advocate for a cause that can't champion its worth even with the sharpest minds an ideal can draw.

I don't regret my choice in '08 one bit. But, looking forward, with a majority of my blame placed on those who espouse social policy directly informed by religious beliefs and in clear violation of the separation of church and state, I can't in good faith support the incumbent who has failed to fight (until now). His party allowed this. The air up there on the high road is very thin.

I am stepping down to take a breath or three and will -- either way, it seems at this point -- suffer through whatever the RNC money machine forces down my throat for the next, post-election eight years. Perhaps spilled oil will soften the sting of the barbs of social injustice headed our way.

Friday, October 9, 2009

Obama's NPP

Catching up on Fb after nonstop meetings today. Truly annoyed at the hate talk about the Pres receiving the NPP. Really? Unlike the Olympics, he didn't solicit it, didn't lobby for it and didn't *ask* for it. Let it go. Seriously.

Are others more deserving? Most likely. Are awards (beyond proven, hard-earned military honors) and award shows ever above board? Doubtful. And that's why I don't watch them. Did Reagan deserve one for certain things he did, as Kevin suggested? Probably. Is he all torn up about having not received one? I think not. Finally, if presented with the honor, what one of you would give a polite, "No thank you," to the committee? Let it go.

Get riled up about something that truly matters; and then do something about it. Effect positive change in your own lives.